Tuesday, September 6, 2011

NCTE Position Statement

When I first read the background and resolution on composing with non-print media, I was both proud and excited about NCTE's stance on non-print composition. They focus on broadening the definition of literacy, promoting multi-media composition, teaching educators how do to so and how to teach it, and reemphasizing the 1983 resolution that focuses on access and research.

I suppose I was surprised that this isn't incorporated into more teaching of writing courses. When I took Teaching College Comp for my Master's this wasn't even brought up. I specifically liked the non-linear emphasis that the resolution makes since many new media applications work best in a non-linear presentation. I was also impressed (yet not surprised) with the addition of the need to be both theoretically and pedagogically grounded. Again, it brings up the idea the idea that you don't just use it to use it.

As of  right now, I'm not sure what I would revise. However, that might change as we move through the course. For me, this resolution aligns with beliefs I already hold. However, the teaching of teachers would be a key point to think about, in addition to the idea that teachers are learning as they're teaching (especially with technology). There does seem to be a significant lack in action on "our" part of the education of educators aspect of the resolution. As far as writing goes, it brings up a very good point of 'what is writing" and "why do we do it the way we do"? I ultimately do prefer the word "composition."


For the WWWWWH's, I have some simple answers, but then addition questions for most of them.

Who-The document itself is particularly directed at teachers, administrators and researchers involved in English and Language arts. However, it does bring up the question of who is teaching? Who is learning? Who should be doing the research?
What-The document brings up the question of what is literacy? What constitutes a non-print source? Is a photocopy of a chapter in a book a non-print source? Does it take different skills to both create and analyze such a source?
Where-I think "Everywhere and Anywhere" sums up the "where" of this resolution. It specifically encourages such production at all levels of "government," but we also have the interplay of the computer-based applications which are more and more socially controlled.
When-Now and in the future, but in looking back, we maybe able to learn from the integration of "other" technologies. When will we start to see significant application of this resolution? Should we be using non-print media across all age groups?
Why-I suppose my answer to this would be because it's part of our cultural context, but the questions we should be asking are: Why is this even an issue? Why is it important?
How-How will we teach new teachers? How will we accommodate for access issues? How will we implement the items on the resolution?

1 comment:

  1. Your "I didn't realize this was here" statement is one of the reasons I wanted to make you all aware of these. What is always fascinating to me is that these are here, some have been here for a long time, and we still have teacher education programs and English departments that have NO idea and/or are blatantly ignoring them.

    ReplyDelete